MERA WOH MATLAB NAHI THA - PLAY REVIEW

When was the last time you thought of watching Anupam Kher and Neena Gupta perform live, to a story written and directed by Rakesh Bedi and return disappointed? NEVER? Well if you’d consider MERA WO MATLAB NAHI THA, the above lines fit in to be only partially true.

On a lazy Sunday evening, the St Andrews auditorium was packed to the capacity with an audience eager to watch the mavericks take the stage. And what transpired then was a bit more than 2 hours of a story which, as soon as spelled out hints of connect, disconnected more rapidly with the elements of extremity that filled up the plot.

35 years had passed since the young romance, brewing in the gullys of Chandni Chowk was not allowed to run its course. And at Lodhi Gardens, feeling the cold morning breeze, as if the breeze symbolically showcased the cold that the protagonists had survived in their lives for 35 long years, Anupam Kher and Neena Gupta meet and discuss everything that had remained unanswered only to realize that some things must remain unanswered.

While the conversations for a major part of the first act of the play were smartly written, the childish and rather absurdly presented flashbacks of the couple and their years at Chandni Chowk was what made me cringe! And from thereon, the narrative became a mix of over the top emotions, larger than life circumstances, lives bordering on extreme ends, all in a play which appeared and began like anything but a slice of life.

The beauty of the narrative laid in the manner of un-layering the emotions which began from refraining and ended up being a tell-it-all tale.

There were letters that didn’t reach their address, negotiations in the name of marriage, domestic violence and criminal instincts, falsely lived parenthood and old age rejection, all of it which was not presented as much it was justified. And that precisely was the pain point.

Everything and everyone in the play had something or the other to justify their behaviour which to me was not required simply because it is understood that all what happens in life can hardly ever be justified and for that either of the protagonist had to be a really morally strong character which sadly none of them was and hence it made all the more painful to accept the justifications.

And more so, if the spark still flew after 35 years, justifications for once could have taken a back seat, complaints could have been on the waiting list and a soulful walk down the memory lane, which needn’t be extraordinary but be very normal or routine could have an impact that could have lasted forever.

Neena Gupta though messed up with a dialogue or two in her performance, commanded immediate attention. Her act was natural, heartfelt and strictly up to what was required out of her role. What stood out in her performance was the playfulness with which she rendered some of her dialogues almost as if teasing Anupam Kher and thus bringing out the playful essence of the romance of the teenage.

Anupam Kher, well if I might say, owned the play. Right from his first line till his concluding phone call, he raised the level of the play and almost covered the magnanimity of extremes in the plot with his simple yet poignant performance. The child in the old man came to life while he narrated one of his teenage life blunders, the maturity of his age came to life when he justified both of them to be too ahead in their lives to be gullible. And what has always been a trademark of Anupam Kher’s performances, be it on stage or in front of the camera, spontaneity and improvisations made the play exciting to watch, all of which Kher was blissfully aware of, toying with lines here and there, creating awkward situations, turning the tide of the conversation here and there and yet being true to the essence of the script. Master class.

Rakesh Bedi too chipped in with his comic timing intact like it was on the television and despite being a very minute character in the entire set up; even he came with emotional baggage, making the already heavy script a tad heavier.

The play survived purely on the performances and despite garnering rave reviews, I found it overrated.

MERA VO MATLAB NAHI THA possibly hinted on the possibilities that could have shaped the destiny in a different manner, talked about a lot that could have been different from the scenario that the characters were in but the point of it remained that possibilities do not happen on their own; paths have to be created to walk on.

Also towards the end, when the characters part, knowing that certain things despite being at any stage of life are not possible, but with the respect for each other intact and having lived 35 years in a span of 3 cold mornings, they realize that things have to end; and the end need not always be how we expect it to be for life is about how we adjust to the ending that we have created for ourselves.

And yes at the fall stage in our lives we do realize how life could have been staggeringly different from the one which has been lived; as an afterthought is good once in a while, it is good to reflect on things and equally important to be in the present at the same time.

Sadly I expected a lot of neutrality and commonness from MERA VO MATLAB NAHI THA, which depended on extraordinary and outrageous, the lazy Sunday evening at the packed St Andrews auditorium still was worthwhile for there were reasons enough to tune in your hearts to the frequency the thespians were performing at.

**2.5STARS**

DIL DHADAKNE DO-- MOVIE REVIEW

The opening few minutes of DDD comfortably take you back in the "Zoya Akhtar" space, languid, sometimes bordering on a lazy kind of a narrative pattern, screenplay that focuses more on observations to be taken from a situation rather than creating them and characters who are driven into the mode of soul searching.

Kamal and Neelam, the forerunners of the elite high society business class in Delhi, plan a cruise to celebrate their 30th marriage anniversary but given the fact that the story is written by Zoya and Reema Katgi, all what seems is never meant to be. 

There are superbly scripted introduction shots (Pluto Mehra- CUTE) of the characters,(Kamal's pride in being self-made, Neelam's anguish, Kabir's passion and Ayesha's success despite facing tremendous neglect) which of late have been chucked out of the modern film making style, brings back a lot of memories from the old school style of film making where the director would make an effort to introduce the audience to the characters and strive to create a unison between what is being portrayed and what is expected by the audience to gauge.

Set on a 10 day cruise across the Mediterranean, the Mehra clan realizes that the heart “needs/wants” (depending upon every character) to beat and not just pump! Whereas Zoya and Reema include issues of Gender inequality, passion ultimately triumphing over expectations, the basic essence of the plot also hints at the “log kya kahenge” aspect.

So to see gorgeous people going on dream/drool worthy vacation only to realize their passions and fight out their self created devils, get to listen to some marvellous philosophical anecdotes (Farhan and Javed Sahab-Why You So Bloody Good?) related to life without getting a hint of preach, cannot ask for more from a film!

And DDD cruises along, involving the audience and whereas you’d want a ZNMD kind of an experience, it would be harsh on DDD to want it to be fulfilling those expectations.

Very rarely, modern film makers use silence as a tool to convey emotions, but when they do, the impact quotient of the film rises to levels beyond expectations. (Lootera is one such classic example)

In a scene which involves Ranveer flying his dream, I somehow could relate it to how Gulzar Sahab used to make films.  There would be long shots, meandering across a landscape, the protagonist caught between life and dreams, and all that chaos would be portrayed in a much relaxed manner, to extent of the audience feeling a sense of calmness in the chaos. Mausam, Aandhi, oh stop me someone! This is about DDD!

Another quality that serves as a huge advantage for Zoya is her ability to carve out characters which compliment her narrative structure.

The Mehra’s are highly uncomfortable in each other’s presence, not willing to understand each other’s problems and trying to live their lives in a bubble which bursts once they board the Vessel.

Ayesha Mehra (Priyanka Chopra) like her father, is self made, takes pride in her performance but faces neglect from her family. Her husband (Rahul Bose) plays by the rules of the patriarchal society, her mother in law (Zarina Wahab) is lost in her own self to the extent of being self obsessed and amidst all of this the Mehra’s too do not give her the attention she deserves.

Much to my amusement, Zoya incorporates a scene where Priyanka tries telling her marriage troubles to her mother and gets a rather cold reply rather than an emphatic one.

Had it not been for the maturity with which the scene has been handled, it could well have been a very negative scene which could have raised questions on the morals of the mother-daughter relationship.

Kamal Mehra (Anil Kapoor), the tycoon, with a troubled married life, is facing bankruptcy and in a desperate attempt to save his image amongst his business colleagues and to find an investor to bail out his company, he sets on the cruise, popping pills to control his anxiety, appearing confident in front of his guests; shattered every moment he finds himself alone.

 His gesture to refrain himself from showing his emotions to her daughter in a tear jerker of a scene establishes the father-daughter relationship like none other.

 His relationship with Ranveer is a contrived one, as is almost every father-son relationship, but when it matters the most, he stands up tall for his son, never for once letting his son fail in anything he had ever wanted to do.

Neelam Mehra (Shefali Shah), who knows of his husband’s infidelity, plays the mother role in what has not always been the quintessential norm in Bollywood. She loves her food, stuffs in cupcakes when she cries, plays the perfect wife in the society and reminds Kamal to return to being normal once they enter their bedroom.

Kabir Mehra (Ranveer Singh), the only heir to AYKA, the star of his mom’s eyes, aspiring pilot forced into family business, a loving brother and an aimless 25 year old (That is one for the masses in this classy film) who finds that nobody in his family TALKS to each other and wants his sister to get the credit of what she deserves. The love affair, while on board, with Farah Ali (the only stereotypical character) makes him bold enough to stand up to what his heart beats for.

Carlos Catalan’s lens captures the film like a dream. Much success of Zoya’s writing (be it ZNMD or DDD) should be attributed Carlos’s cinematographic skills, painting what the writer writes, with every emotion getting the desired set up. This is what a director could ever ask for!

 Zoya’s previous film, ZNMD and her latest film DDD, talk about the same thing on a broad level. Whereas in ZNMD, the inner conflicts inflicted within the characters as well as the equation between the characters was equally interesting to watch, DDD fails to impress much in singularity than it does when it takes the issues of all its characters in chorus.

Then there is Farhan Akhtar who’s written the dialogues and the wry humour that you’d generally associate with Farhan is visibly apparent with the lines he’s written! The vomit jokes were hysterical!

Javed Akhtar has penned the songs and while the lyrics are thoughtful, the music this time around does not match up to the standards that Shankar-Ehsaan-Loy have set for themselves barring Phir Bhi Ye Zindagi track. (Amazing is the word)

While the Mehra’s steal the show, the ensemble cast too performs exceptionally well, Manoj Pahwa in particular is a delight to watch. Zarina Wahab, Parmeet Sethi, Farhan Akhtar and Aamir Khan lend tremendous support to the narrative.

It is also pertinent to note that Zoya Akhtar has a very unique style of presentation of her writings and there are visible influences of Javed Sahab on her style of writing.

Whereas Javed Sahab’s work used to remain more on the philosophical lines, Zoya has the ability to link it with the routine lives of individuals and hence poetry flows into the motion picture in a manner that it is understood by all.

Another important aspect with Zoya’s style of film making is the need for a character to step in to a situation to set the proceedings underway, leaving scope for conflicts to develop.

Katrina played such a character in ZNMD; Anushka does the same in DDD. It is post her entry that the film moves on the plot line and mind you, the plot is not very much logical at times.

Overall, Zoya does a really fine job with her 4^th project. The confrontation scene involving the Mehra’s post Kamal’s medical emergency, the scene where Ayesha’s divorce is discussed or the simple ice creaming hogging scene involving Kabir and Ayesha, the emotions are subtly underplayed and yet are able to be comprehended with much ease.

 Over the top definitely was not what the director wanted! But as the movie drew to a close, OTT started to be the norm none the less with an unbelievable climax and an abrupt end.

The philosophy that Zoya roots for, living in the moment, doing what the heart says, letting it go, following your dreams, appears to be that particular escape route which everyone, somewhere or the other wants to explore but is unable to and that precisely serves as a strong emotional connect between the viewers and the film on display.

Or to put it differently, she does the same with the use of art and poetry what Rajkumar Hirani does with comedy and prose.

With a run time of over 175 minutes, DDD probably had a little bit less of the substance to be offered. But what it did deliver was effective anyway.

Let the Heart Beat- Dil Dhadakne Do- as it literally means, might turn as a film which would annoy some, enjoyed by some but be revisited by many for it is rare to find philosophy, poetry, humour and message coming in a package as well decorated as DDD.  

P.S.1- Anil Kapoor is FANTASTIC.

P.S.2- Ranveer Singh is (FANTASTIC)^infinity . Period.

LET YOUR HEART BEAT, DO WHAT YOU WERE ALWAYS AFRAID TO.

**3.5 STARS**

TANU WEDS MANU RETURNS-- MOVIE REVIEW

Anand L Rai had stormed the industry a few years back with Tanu Weds Manu. The movie gave a major boost to Kangana Ranaut's acting prowess and established Rai as a very sought after director who knew the task at hand, storytelling.

Four years have passed since and Raanjhana (alluring, if I might use that word) happened meanwhile, Kangana won a National Award and 2015 saw one of the most anticipated film in recent times releasing.

 And it all starts with our cutesy couple Tanu and Manu, now having realized the horrors of staying with each other go to a mental asylum to seek re-dressal. (Seriously, Who Does That???) Ok accepted. Let’s move on.

Tanu Returns, with her ishtyle now graduating to the swag stage, Manu Returns, with the similar toned down demeanour albeit he is angry/irritated this time around!

Tanu sits wrapped around in a towel making fun of an IT engineer (Well, everybody makes fun of an IT guy) who has come along with his family with a marriage proposal for Tanu's sister. Expectations rising.

And post a hilarious 10 minutes sequence involving Pappi Ji and a divorce notice being sent to Tanu, the film travels downhill and that too at a rapid pace! 

(Also a point that needs highlight upfront is that TWMR is not that bad a film. It is enjoyable at fair enough moments and a good piece for time pass, which is also what the audience expected out of the film, but I as a viewer went away disappointed simply because the extraordinary connection that the characters had established 4 years back was somehow not there at all, it all appeared superficial)

Deepak Dobariyal happens to be in fine form as the lovable Pappi Ji who also gets the best lines in the film. And he does justice to his role. 

Zeeshan Aayub's character graph soars off from nowhere and then disappears mid way and re surges towards the end making a fine performance getting demolished under the muddled plot.

Swara Bhaskar, Rajesh Sharma and the other ensemble performs as per the requirement.

None the less, this film belongs to Kusum Sangwan more than it belongs to Tanuja Trivedi! Kangana is outright superlative in portraying Kusum's character. And despite glitches in the character sketch, Kusum is the character that stays with you long after the film is over. Kangana's Tanu is not convincing this time around apart from a wonderful performance set on Ja Ja Bewafaa song! 

Jimmy Shergil provides much solidarity to the film. While Jimmy Shergil is in a more calmed down avatar of  Raja Awasthi, he is brilliant never the less. A good friend of mine and a thespian by profession once said that to act, the dialogue needs to come out from the eyes! The hope that Raja sees on Tanu returning to his life and the hurt when it crashes is all visible in the eyes!  

Madhavan's Manu Bhaiya is not even half as convincing. It is just the screen presence of Madhavan that somehow makes up for his act. In fact the way his character behaves and transforms during the film made me hate his character this time around. What's with being in love if you can't stand for it, Manu sir!?

Amidst an abundant universe of supremely talented supporting cast, TWMR never quite delivers the high it promises to. And there could not be more than two broad reasons for the same-

a) The focus shifts from the concept to the characters, AND/OR

b) Clap-tracks diluting the larger picture that the film is aiming at

And as the case is most of the time, the balloon of expectations bursts on the head of the director! Rai does show his grip at times and the movie breezes across stretches, expectations rise and then the bubble bursts.

The gross error that the movie does is that you never know what conclusion is the movie coming to? And that happens purely due to a half baked plot which is served up with glitzy little elements to make up for the same.

I have always failed to understand the sensibilities behind making sequels to films which were once successful unless there was a thought in the head since inception to plan out a movie series.

But to be true to the producer also being a human, there is not a faster way available to churn out cash than to build up on an existing hype of the prequel, run on its established popularity and visibility and reach out to a large expecting audience.

Yes, agreeing to fact that there have been sequels which were not initially planned but turned up to be good films (some in fact better--refer the Munna-Bhai series), the ratio is not even worth discussing.

You knew you laughed during the film, blew whistles but could not find a single scene worth the remembrance! And that my dear folks, is where TWMR mixes with the garbage of such related films. 

This is probably how it feels when the expectations come crashing down, be it in the reel or the real life!

**1.5 STARS**

PIKU - MOTION SE HI EMOTION-- MOVIE REVIEW

Piku, Shoojit Sircars's latest offering is a film that borders on being irritatingly cute. The opening credits roll out on a black screen to the tune of a wonderfully composed sitar composition (Anupam Roy). And that kind of sets up the mood of the film, relaxed but never laid back. Analytical, yet never probing. 

More than the script or the concept, what works for Sircar is the conversational style in which the film has been conceptualized and executed. Also the conversations work so effectively purely because of the wonderful characters that have been etched out. 

Sircar, being a pro that he is in creating humorous community centric antics (The Punjabi-Bengali tiff in Vicky Donor where the two families meet at Vicky's house to discuss the wedding remains one of the best community clash/conflict I've ever seen), this time around takes on a Bengali family and a slice from their life, sketches it across a Delhi canvas and paints it with shades of a road trip, vintage Calcutta cinematography and soul searching conversations to deliver a a film which doesn't seem effective from the outset but grows on you invariably.

Trapped between her father's tantrums and her work life pressure, Piku is searching for her moment to break free, to breathe without tension. This might not be apparent but Piku is one of the finest acts by Deepika considering the varied range of emotions which were required, sometimes in a single frame. Her care-free nature which has genuine care for her father, who more often than not drags her to the heights of getting irritated, taking sex as a need more than anything else, for her father's over protective nature and logical reasoning wouldn't let her settle down to the final gentle conversations with Irrfan, she looks like she owns Piku's character. (Also I find myself for the first time praising Deepika Padukone for her acting skills)

Amitabh Bachchan plays the bowel-troubled Bengali father who wishes to get through one good motion at least before he dies. So life for him has taken a metaphorical turn where all he could think is about toilets, gastro troubles and shit and relating life situations to it. So while it is utterly nonsensical at times, humorous for a large part, it is also heart warming at fair enough places. And it is only an actor of the class of Sr. Bachchan who could pull it off with such poise. 

Hidden beneath the obvious truth of death was an insatiable desire to live. 

Buried under the image of an over protective father and a selfish ego filled man was a child who came to life while Bachchan cycled across Calcutta. 

And of course there is Irrfan Khan who gave Bachchan Sahab a run for his money every freaking time they appeared together on the screen. Also one could easily gauge the way the two of them were trying to surpass each other in almost every frame with such great spontaneity. Given the fact that Irrfan's character was the one who brings about a sense of calmness and steadiness to the proceedings, he too carries an emotional backlog. Though it is never fully explored, it is faintly narrated none the less. So at least as far as casting is concerned Piku does not leave any loose end. 

{P.S--Irrfan Khan is a sheer genius} 

As per the requirements of a conversational style of film making, there a lot of characters who do not have a very large impact on the final picture but they are efficient enough to create subtle moments here and there. Piku's Mausi, her Aunt, the servant and Deepika's partner are such characters. 

(Mind you some of the conversations helmed by Deepika's Mausi are outright hilarious)

It would be unfair to not make a reference to the Man who gave birth to this kind of film making, brought about the stories that touched anyone who saw it for somewhere, it were their stories. 

Back in the mid 60's, entire 70's and early 80's, there was a brand of cinema that was emerging in India, a new era which was seemingly creating its space in the Indian Movie plethora. Film aficionados popularly refer to it as the Hrishikesh Mukherjee era, the time where conversational style of film making easily surpassed heavy concept backed films; the times when a movie would not make you fall off your seats laughing but had a rare capacity to bring a smile and stretch out a tear, all in one scene, one singular emotion.

(Basu Chatterjee too held on to this brand of film making before the Parallel Cinema movement took Indian Film Industry by storm with the likes of Shyam Benegal, Gulzar, Saeed Akhtar Mirza, Govind Nihalani etc controlling the reins.)

And it was only in the mid 2000's that we, the Hindi  film audience saw a film maker (Rajkumar Hirani) trying to walk on the path created by Hrishi Da, which had been long forgotten. With the huge success that Hirani experienced, there emerged a lot of film makers who were picking up concepts from the daily life of an individual and trying to create a scenario which was more involving and immersive than it was repulsive and expressive.

And I find it fair enough to relate Sircar's latest work to the legacy that Hrishi Da left behind.

The huge advantage that Sircar has as a film maker is his versatile nature of film making. If Yahaan was captivating, Vicky Donor was conceptually brilliant, Madras Cafe was as honest as a real story could get, Piku is immersive and more of a self realization journey of the characters involved. 

Another thing which strikes me is the huge advantage Sircar derives from being from an advertising background that he knows the customer perspective, he can think like his audience and hence we see his films having an instant connect with the audience. So while he directs the conversation to yield the desired emotions, Juhi Chaturvedi's delightful writing keeps the motions going. Also there is a beautiful parting scene when Irrfan leaves from Champakunj and Deepika looks on. Okay there are many such scenes.

While the cinematography is catchy and visually very appealing, the editing department churns out a crisply done film. The surprise elements though are the wonderful compositions by Anupam Roy. Fresh is the word which comes to my mind. Bezubaan has become a personal favourite. 

The film does get stuck at times when you realize that there is no logical end where this movie could lead to. There are moments when the screenplay does nothing to add up to the movie's virtue and the pot talks do go over board at places but all of this is never the less pulled up before things could go out of proportion. 

To be a little mild, this could be termed as Sircar's most self indulgent work. 

There are emotional under-currents that flow throughout the film. While the emotional journey of Deepika and Bachchan Sahab comes to a very conclusive and logical end, Irrfan's journey is left incomplete and that is a very sour point that remains for me from the film.

To be really honest, Piku does not live up to the vibe that Vicky Donor had generated or the grit that Madras Cafe had on display but it, at its own pretty pace lives up to the beauty of its conversations and relationships.

**3 STARS**

DUM LAGA KE HAISHA - MOVIE REVIEW

Cinema is essentially a medium to portray an artist’s thoughts with the use of motion pictures. And the thoughts could either be radical or the simple ones, the little moments of the daily life; which fail to get noticed due to their regularity.

So accordingly there are stories that sway you into zones of wilderness and happiness, actors that perform as if they were born to play that role and then there are moments, which if captured can literally melt your hearts and involve you, for these are the moments which are relatable and hence the connect of relativeness clicks and it clicks well.  

Dum Laga Ke Haisha, produced by YRF is also the studio’s best offering since many years now. Far from the glitzy and the flossy love stories which meander too much without any substance, DLKH has its heart in the right place. The film remains true to every emotion that it wanted every scene to generate. And for a love story, that is half the battle won.

The script for once beamed with novelty, the writing sparkled with freshness and the result turned out to be some of the most heart warming visuals on celluloid.

The screenplay never for once meandered along wayward lines but it left a lot of scope for myriad emotions to develop as a result of any particular scene and that essentially was the beauty of the film. It left the window open for the audience to develop their emotion towards a particular event in the film and not be restricted to what was being portrayed.

The cinematographer, to me, performed the real magic for this film to be what it is. The lens brought out Rishikesh on the 70mm curtain, the locals, their antics, their values and themselves. A lot of credit must also be given to the casting director. Almost the entire team of Aakhon Dekhi (one of the most beautiful films I have seen) appears as the supporting cast, right from Sanjay Mishra to Seema Pahwa. With such a bunch of actors and an honest story, you seldom go wrong, and DLKH does not.

As much as DLKH is about accepting and acknowledging one’s own shortcomings, it is also about learning to live with what you have got for there is nothing which can be achieved in totality. There is always that tad bit left out.

Aayushman Khurana (Prem) is brutally honest with his performance. To me he is a highly underrated actor. There are scenes in which he outshines even 7 people in a frame, all mouthing dialogues. He renders the emotions of fear, sadness, confusion, angst, ignorance and pain with much ease. His transition from the high headed boy to the man, who has practically nothing to justify his high headedness, is portrayed through one beautiful scene. The scene where he finally accepts the truth of his life is extremely well enacted.

Sanjay Mishra and Seema Pahwa outshine a brilliant supporting cast with their own style of acting. Sanjay Mishra in particular is adorable as Aayushman’s father and his scenes with Aayushman evoke laughter.

But rest assured folks; Bhoomi Pednekar (Sandhya) is the real hero here. She performs with an infectious energy and carries a vibe throughout the film. Her straight forward character is a perfect counter to that of Aayushman’s and it is amazing to see the confidence with which she has lived this role. Her dreams and ambitions are a contrast to the life of Aayushman, dictated by his father all along. She sees nothing wrong with herself (which her husband does) despite being fat for she has genuine respect for the relation unlike Aayushman who was again dictated into getting married.

For a debutant actress to perform such range of emotions is no mean task and Bhoomi performs her part as a champion. Despite there being refreshing dialogues, a lot is said in through the silence between the lead pair. Take my vote already for Bhoomi Pednekar as the Best Actress this season.

The director set up his premise in the 90’s and manages to present it as is on the screen. Right from the script to the performances to the flow of the film, he seemed to be in total command and never for once let the film delve on loose ends for he left none. It did not appear to be a debut effort at all. But his biggest achievement lies in the fact that he managed to maintain a smile on the audiences faces for the entire duration of the film.

 You could not imagine a film in the 90’s decade in Bollywood without a Kumar Sanu song. The signature Lata Mangeshkar aalap which comes up along with the YRF logo got smartly replaced with that of Sanu’s, sufficient enough to transport the audience into the 90’s for his voice still has the ability to define the decade that the 90’s was.

All said and done, the message from the film is fairly a simple one but we being humans, skip out the simple part with much simplicity and maroon ourselves into finding simplicity again.

Marriage is but a cassette, the environment, a tape recorder.  There are ought to be glitches but a drop of glue here and there and a bit of patience and the will to make things work will surely bring a clumsy cassette back to life. The music will play, melodies will flow and the rhythm will come back. All it requires is an effort to understand the environment and fit into the groove.

Take your loved ones for this fine film. Learn to appreciate the other one and be aware of your short comings.

Life indeed is AS simple as it seems.

**4.5 STARS**

UGLY - Movie Review

So the end of 2014 saw two of the most anticipated films being released; PK and Ugly, both being the products of the masters of film making with diametrically different narrative patterns and storytelling techniques. While one of them is on its way to enter the 300 Crore club, the other is silently asking for an audience.

Let this be said that Ugly is one of the finest psychological thrillers I've seen since the 1980's film Dhund (a barely noticed film starring Danny Danzongpa). There is hardly anything that goes over board or remains undercooked, the pace being maintained throughout the 128 minutes.

(When will PVR Cinemas start and end its shows in time!?!

A humble request folks, never visit PVR to see a Ashutosh Gowarikar film; you might require a 2N/3D stay in the Auditorium.)

Ugly is what Anurag Kashyap has always put on display ever since he screen wrote for Satya, his love for dysfunctional characters.

So be it Wasseypur or Dev D or Gulaal, it has been much about characters than it has been about the situations that Kashyap puts his characters into.

The realism that we see visibly apparent in Kashyap's films is not because of realistic situations but due to his character's reactions to dramatic situations which always brings out certain kind of novelty in his work.

He drives his films thorough his dysfunctional characters reactions to simple situations and Ugly is simply a treat to watch for some amazing characterizations.

Within 5 minutes into the film comes a scene which for me is the best scene of 2014, trademark Anurag Kashyap, filled with confusion, like the plan+plot-to-kill-Sultan scene in Gangs of Wasseypur. The scene is painfully hilarious and so are various other scenes which bring out troubled and bothered kind of laughs’ which goes on the show the power of the screenplay, never for once letting the style to blow the substance out of proportion. 

Another facet of Kashyap cinema is his willingness to portray awkward situations and not caring to explain out the consequences.

It is only in his films will you see a mother mix sleep pills in a glass of milk and feed it to her daughter so that she can satisfy her desires with her husband's friend.

Awkward? Yes. Indulging? Indeed.

In one of the more remarkable scenes in the film, a guy stacks a pile of currency notes in his undies and dances hysterically. Abnormal? Yes. Indulging? Indeed.

Also you cannot attribute to anything except the dysfunctional psyche of the characters for such a behavior.

The first 45 minutes of the film brim with confusion and set up the base for events to then unfold and fit in the mould. The only low point being the ending few minutes which probably fail to convey the exact emotions which the 2nd half desired to be concluded but rest assured, Ugly is a taut thriller.

The performances are first rate as you'd expect. You just cannot look out for the best performance amongst such inspired acts but Ronit Roy somehow just manages to over shine everyone else. He has a complex character which he doesn't bother to simplify which turns out to be a boon!

He's haunting with his approach, self indulgent at times and fighting inner motives at other moments. 

He's highly sure when he deals with outsiders and insecure in humongous proportions when he's to deal with himself.

The highpoint in the entire film isn't the performances or the narrative pattern but the scope for obscurity that the screen play allows with respect to the main plot.

So much obscure the plot becomes that a missing case is soon over shadowed by personal rivalries and numerous cross connections which kind of dilute out the substance of the main plot not only for the viewers but also for the characters and such confusion has been helmed in patented Anurag Kashyap style, stark realizations underlined with dark humour. 

Ugly is technically a very superior film. The editor has done his bit judiciously and the shot takings are innovative. The cinematography captures the confusion in the atmosphere in which Ugly breaths and the background score moulds into the mood of the scene. Picture perfect!

Anurag Kashyap's Ugly might fit into multiple genres; thriller, psychological drama, noir et al. The rare damp moment towards the end does not take away much from the chilling impact that lasts for about the entire length of the film.

Do watch this film, it holds a bare it all approach, doesn't generalize situations, digs into uncomfortable alleys and fits in chills and thrills in equal proportions. 

Ugly is amongst the best films made in 2014 and probably also the least recognized 

(Nah, Aakho Dekhi didn't even garner as much hype as Ugly, sad!)

**4.5STARS**